Every Friday, the Brennan Center will be
compiling the latest news concerning the corrosive nature of money in New York
State politics—and the ongoing need for public financing and robust campaign
finance reform. We’ll also be linking to dispatches from around the country
highlighting the national scope of this crisis. This week’s links were
contributed by Syed Zaidi.
For more stories on an ongoing basis, follow the Twitter hashtag#moNeYpolitics and #fairelex.
CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND ETHICS NEWS
NEW YORK
Qualcomm Discloses Political Spending
New
York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli, manager and trustee of the state
retirement fund, has dropped a lawsuit against wireless tech giant Qualcomm following
the company’s
decision to disclose its political expenditures. Under a new policy
released by Qualcomm, it will post its contributions
to political candidates, parties, trade organizations and 501(c)(4)
organizations for each fiscal year online. “Qualcomm’s disclosure policy sets a
high standard for transparency in corporate political spending disclosure and
the company deserves praise for its actions,” DiNapoli stated. The Albany Times-Union
editorialized in favor of DiNapoli, praising his
initiative. “We encourage Mr. DiNapoli to continue to use the $152.9 billion
state pension fund's ample clout to make more companies come clean. And
let's hope that other public pension trustees and other public officials are
following this instructive tale.” Qualcomm’s voluntary disclosures will benefit
its shareholders, but investors
need the protection of a uniform, nationwide rule requiring disclosure of
corporate political expenditures.
NY State
Senator Brad Holyman: End Albany’s Pay-to-Play Culture
New York State Senator Brad Hoylman has an
excellent op-ed in The Villager this week. Hoylman states that
despite incremental improvements in ethics reforms following landmark
legislation last year, Albany’s pay-to-play culture will not end until campaign
finance laws are changed as well. New York’s contribution limits are 12 times
higher than the national median for states and 10 times greater than the limit
for presidential candidates. Corporate contributions, banned in almost half of all
states, are the norm in New York. Political party housekeeping accounts, which
can accept unlimited donations from individuals and corporations, serve as a loophole
that creates the possibility of giving in excess of New York’s sky-high limits.
“Fortunately, we have a widely celebrated model of a fair and functional
campaign finance law right here in New York City.” Candidates for any elective
office in New York City can qualify for public funding if they raise enough
money from small donors. Contribution limits are low and only living, breathing
individuals can donate to a candidate. Two of the State Senate’s three
conference leaders have pledged their support for campaign finance reform.
Let’s push to make sure “Albany has the best
politicians money can’t buy.”
NATIONAL
Poll: Majority
of Americans Agree with Aggregate Contribution Limits
The U.S. Supreme Court announced last week that it will
hear McCutcheon v. Federal Election
Commission, a case which challenges the cap on the aggregate amount that
individuals can donate to federal candidates. The case does not question general
contribution limits established for individual candidates, but rather the
total amount of money that one person can donate to various campaigns per election cycle. According to a new poll by the Huffington Post and YouGov, Americans are in broad agreement
regarding restrictions on the total amount of money that one person can donate
to federal candidates. Only 12 percent of Americans think that there should be
no limits on aggregate contributions. Fourty-four percent that the 2012 aggregate
limit of $46,200 is too high. Eighteen percent think the current limit is
“about right,” and 23 percent remain unsure. A majority of
respondents across partisan lines, including 56 percent of Republicans, 66 percent of Democrats and 60
percent of Independents, regard the current aggregate limit as either too high
or “about right.”
Democratic
Congressional Primary Candidate in Florida Charged with Campaign Violations
Justin Sternad, a Democratic primary candidate in
Florida’s 26th Congressional district, was
charged in federal court last Friday with conspiracy to violate federal campaign laws, making false statements
and accepting illegal campaign contributions. Sternad was competing against Joe
Garcia in the Democratic primary. The Miami
Herald published stories last year claiming that Sternad had received money
from Republican David Rivera, who was also running for the 26th
district slot. Garcia eventually went on to win the primary against Sternad and
the general election against Rivera. Meanwhile irregular
financial filings from
Sternad’s campaign caught the eye of federal officials and prosecutors. Sternad
claimed he made $64,000 in loans to his congressional campaign on FEC filings,
but in reality the total was less than $300. Rivera may have been the source of
nearly $81,486 in unreported checks and cash to Sternad, although Rivera denies
these allegations.
Lobbyists
Entice Lawmakers Ahead of Sequester Deadline
Today is the deadline for the budget
sequester, which will trim a significant amount of money from various
government agencies. Numerous lobbyists are hoping to maintain their piece of
pie from the federal government by enticing legislators with lavish receptions
and events. According to the Sunlight
Foundation, at least 40
House and Senate members hosted or attended fundraisers this week. Senator John
Cornyn (R-Texas) was
feted at the office a lobbying firm Patton Boggs, which represents high end clients like General Electric
and Goldman Sachs. Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Florida) will
host a fundraiser this weekend
for her leadership PAC, Democrats Win Seats, behind the home plate of the
Yankees and Phillies game at the annual Spring Training Weekend in Florida. The
weekend getaway also includes a welcome reception at the Hyatt Regency Clearwater
Beach Resort and Spa. A comprehensive
list of events is available on
the Public Campaign website. As Public Campaign explains, “It’s another
reason Congress should pass legislation like the Fair Elections Now Act that
would encourage candidates to run for office by relying on a mix of small
donations and matching public funds.”
No comments:
Post a Comment