The
Brennan Center regularly compiles the latest news concerning the corrosive
nature of money in New York State politics—and the ongoing need for public
financing and robust campaign finance reform. This week’s links were
contributed by Syed Zaidi.
For more
stories on an ongoing basis, follow the Twitter hashtags #moNeYpolitics and #fairelex.
NEW
YORK
Gov. Cuomo May Oppose Senate Coalition if Public
Financing Isn’t Passed
Governor
Andrew Cuomo implied this week that he may oppose the
ruling Senate coalition of Republicans and Independent Democrats this coming
fall if the chamber does not pass public campaign
financing. “If public finance is not passed by the end of session, I will
consider the [Senate] coalition a failure,” Cuomo said. “I would give my
opinion to the people of the state,” he continued. The governor is facing pressure from the progressive
Working Families Party, which might not endorse him on the party’s ballot
line if he doesn’t achieve public financing reform. The party’s nominating
convention is this Saturday. Independent Democratic Conference Senator Jeffrey Klein, who leads the
chamber in a power-sharing agreement with the Republicans, has also insisted
that reform must be enacted before the end of the session. He did not rule out
aligning with the mainstream Democrats if it fails. Former state Attorney
General Oliver Koppell will be challenging Klein in the June Democratic
primary. Although negotiations were well underway with
Republicans regarding public funding, the discussions were derailed following a
warning from the Conservative Party.
Conservative Party Chairman Mike Long told Skelos that his party would not endorse Senate
Republican candidates
if they vote for public financing reform.
NYS Board of Elections Will No Longer Enforce
Aggregate Contribution Limit
Commissioners
at the New York State Board of Elections decided last week that the board will no longer enforce the state’s $150,000
aggregate contribution limit. Under the state’s aggregate limit, a single
individual could not contribute more than $150,000 combined per calendar year to
all political campaigns, parties, and independent committees in New York. The
board’s announcement came after recent court rulings concerning aggregate
contribution limits. In early April, the U.S. Supreme Court declared federal
aggregate contribution limits unconstitutional in McCutcheon v. FEC. Soon thereafter, a judgment by a federal
district court nullified New York’s
aggregate contribution limit of $150,000 as applied to independent expenditure
groups, such as super PACs. The recent Board of Elections decision nullifies
the aggregate contribution cap regarding donations to all candidates, parties,
and political action committees, in addition to independent expenditure groups.
Albany
Times-Union: Public Financing
Reform More Urgent Without Aggregate Contribution Limits
Yesterday,
the Albany Times-Union criticized the Board of Elections’ decision to not enforce the
state’s aggregate contribution limit, saying it would allow a single wealthy
donor to “pour millions of dollars into an election like this fall’s, when
every state office will be up for grabs.” As it stands, New York’s individual contribution limits are
already sky-high: $41,000 for statewide offices, $8,400 for the Senate and
$4,100 for the Assembly—just for the general election. The decimation of aggregate contribution limits only
exacerbates the problem. To make matters even worse, since Limited Liability Corporations
(LLCs) are subject to individual
rather than corporate contribution limits under New York campaign finance
regulations, one person could set up several different subsidiaries to funnel
millions more into state campaigns. The editorial called on the legislature and
Governor Cuomo to immediately take action by reducing the individual
contribution limits for state offices, closing the LLC loophole, and
instituting a system of public campaign financing so that elected officials can
“pay attention to small donors,” rather than just courting millionaire
contributors.
Buffalo Common Council Passes Resolution to
Explore Small Donor Public Financing
The
Buffalo Common Council passed a resolution this week to explore the possibility of adopting a public
campaign financing system for local offices. Council Member Joseph Golombek,
who is pushing the measure, commended his colleagues for being open to
reform, especially considering that it would allow challengers to “actually…raise
money,” when running against incumbents. According to the resolution, in 2011,
incumbents in the Buffalo Common Council outraised opponents by a margin of 24-to-1.
The resolution charged a committee, composed of citizens from local labor
unions and advocacy organizations, with examining the possibilities of a municipal
public financing system. Susan Lerner, Executive Director of Common Cause New
York, praised the resolution, calling it an opportunity to “bring more small
donors into elections,” and to broaden the “range of candidates” running for
office.